June 20th, 2006

You are currently browsing the articles from datapoohbah.com written on June 20th, 2006.

Cisco Networkers 2006 [Contact Center Reporting] Part 3 of ??

Cisco Unified Contact Center Express Reporting.

First, fix the naming of all of these products. Unified this, express, that. It’s still all too confusing. Holy shiznit.

I attended this session today because we have reporting needs and to be blunt, CAR and Cisco Historical Reporting are a heaping pile of pooh.

Sure they give you some nifty reports out of the box, but chances that they are the reports you need are almost nil. Customizing those reports is a royal pain in the nether region.

I attended this session today because I wanted to see what Cisco had in store for us. Just what they were working on to make our lives easier. If all of what Mr. Chambers had talked about in his Key note is just around the corner, then by golly, there’s going to be some serious reporting needs on the back end.

To give you a little background. Cisco IPCCX and Call Manager, and I know those may not be the “Proper” names these days but that’s what I’m sticking with for now. Have used some form of bundled/canned crystal for a while. Version 8.5 and in 4.x you get to use 10.

But it’s still too awkward and cumbersome to customize to get the reports you need.

Can it be done? Sure. Heck they are kind enough to give you the database schema. What more could you ask for?

I tell you what I can ask for, something user friendly along with a process that isn’t 72 steps long. You shouldn’t have to write a stored procedure for basic reports. Nope, that shouldn’t be necessary.

I happened to show up to this class a little early and took the opportunity to preview the slide handouts. I could see that the bulk of the material was about customizing these Crystal reports. Ugh.

When we first installed our Cisco Phone system, let it run for a couple weeks and ran a few reports, some of our people didn’t even show up in the ‘canned’ reports. Yes, you read that right, a big WTF?

So we dipped into the database and took a look. The data was there. So we wrote our own.

At the time we were evaluating Business Objects. Don’t get me started on them. We couldn’t even buy that product or get pricing when we had money in hand to spend. So we did the next best thing. We looked at what else was out there. To that end we stumbled upon Microsoft SQL 2k5 Reporting services.

Within a day or two we had the reports we wanted, on the web, for any one of the mangers to run ad-hoc as needed. Guess what? The could print them, export them to Excel, and even subscribe to them and have them emailed. Something that even today Cisco says is on the feature list.

Before the lecture, I asked the two Cisco folks if they had given Reporting services a look. They asked what I was referring too and what it was about. I explained it comes with Microsoft SQL Server 2k5.

They said; “Oh,no, Our road map is to move away from Microsoft products towards *nix, so we wouldn’t look down that path. Well excuse me. But you still have a windows based product and damnit you ship SQL server so update that to 2005 and you’re problems go away.

But I let it go.

As I sat through the program, I watched in awe as I saw NO improvement to the customization process over the way it was a year ago. It’s still too damn complicated. It shouldn’t be this hard. It is NOT user friendly and doesn’t promote innovation or data mining.

I hung around afterwards to show them what we have done using SQL Reporting Services and managed to show a few of them. They appeared to be impressed. No templates, no stored procedures, no command line updates, nothing hard. All easy and much nicer than the current crazy ness that’s being shipped today, then it was like I was invisible. All of a sudden nobody was talking to me except someone from support. I gave him my business card in case they wanted to discuss it, but I don’t think he grasped the scope of things.

There is a lot broken in the Cisco administration and user experience. Reporting is only one part of it. But it’s a big part.

There is a huge opportunity for a 3rd party to step up. I know some have already, but even they seem to make it harder than it is.

During the session we talked about things like Outbound Call modules, and Email Queuing and reporting. Things that will be in the 5.x train (the *nix flavor) and will be merged with the 6.x train (the Windows flavor) but that won’t happen until end of year 2007. If they are saying that NOW, then they still have a relationship with Microsoft and Reporting Services should be a part of that.

By end of calendar year 2007 reporting services will be huge. Now, don’t mistake me for a Microsoft advocate. They certainly screw up more than their fair share, but this is one product that is really right.

C’mon Cisco make something easy and fun to work with would ya?

Written by datapoohbah on June 20th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Commentary and IT and Miscellaneous and The Truth Hurts.

Cisco Networkers 2006 [Content based billing and filtering technologies] part 2 of ??

Content based billing and filtering technologies.

Boy was I in the wrong place at the wrong time. I attended this session because I wanted to learn more about billing hosting customers for bandwidth and potentially learn more about filtering technologies. But I didn’t read the fine print. This was mostly geared towards mobile content providers and providing them with a solution to give us all pay as you go solutions to bandwidth.

Simply put not enough of us are signing up for the “unlimited data” packages here in the US because the cost too much. ~$50 to $70 dollars is way too much for data really for a handheld mobile device when all most of us are going to do is email and/or SMS.

As the presenter put it; 1mb of data could be many things…

333 emails @ 3kb per email
250 WAP pages @ 4kb per page
67 html pages @15k per page (very optimistic I might add)
45 pages of text @ 22kb per page
2 reasonable quality pictures
20% of a 5mb mp3
Or 15% of a 30 second 7mb mpeg video clip.

So should we all be charged the same for the same 1mb?

I guess it depends on where you stand. Cisco certainly doesn’t care. The carriers however need to make money, or want to…

The whole idea here is to basically create a method by which you can charge or create packages that fit certain lifestyles.

As an example; I still have never used any of Verizons vCast technologies and I probably never will. Even with EVDO it’s still too slow. I also don’t want to watch thumbnail sized anything. Nope, not even music videos. But, as I understand it that might not be true of the teenagers today. So while they cannot afford unlimited data, they may be willing to pay for videos on click at a time. One video at a time, regardless of length or data size. Some might be 4mb some might be 6mb. But based upon the content type (in this case [video], the provider could charge or debit the customer x-number of credits for each video downloaded.

Same thing for emails and short SMS type messages, you might be permitted a larger number of them during the night or off peak periods for less of a hit than during peak periods.

Cisco has a solution.

I don’t know if I like it. But it’s there and quite frankly this isn’t new. Perhaps it’s new to this industry, but it aint new.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Written by datapoohbah on June 20th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Commentary and IT.

This Is Why We Need Info EVERYWHERE!!!

20060619.jpg

In light of Mr. Poohbah’s rant below, today’s Penny-Arcade is pretty funny.

Written by CmdrChalupa on June 20th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on The Truth Hurts.

Cisco Networkers 2006 [The Keynote & and my wireless us busted] part 1 of ??

Opening Day, Keynote and what not.

John Chambers and the Magical “Baseball and Technolgy” Demo.

Uhm, John, put the crack pipe down please.

First you talk about all these wonderful technologies. These vaporware things running across the ‘Network’, which is now the ‘platform’, and on the 2nd day; we Networker attendees couldn’t check our schedules or reliably log into the provided wireless network. That’s a big oops.

The entire Networkers scheduling infrastructure was down in the Hilton end of the conference before and after the keynote. *Most* of them were down in the Conference center as well too. Now granted this was an impressive thing to pull off, but this is “The here and now”, and that’s what the 10,000 attendees are hear to deal with, and Cisco and the partners failed to deliver that at the conference.

Mr. Chambers started off strong, explaining how Cisco was right in 1996 when nobody else was. So basically we need to listen to them now. Setting the stage so that when the demo commenced and we watched all the nonsense, we could reflect back and say, “Well, they were right 10 years ago, so they must be right now”. But now isn’t 10 years ago.
Don’t get me wrong, there is a lot right in what Cisco is doing. Being hell bent on video though, just drives me crazy. I’m happy for you Mr. Chambers that you find video conferencing a great productivity enhancement. That for you it’s a wonderful tool. But most of the world doesn’t want it, and/or isn’t ready for that just yet. A lot of people just don’t want to be seen. Especially when dealing with strangers. But that’s another point and I don’t want to get off topic.

This crazy demo…

(more…)

Written by datapoohbah on June 20th, 2006 with no comments.
Read more articles on Commentary and IT and Miscellaneous and The Truth Hurts and VOIP.